🔗 Share this article

The federal appeals court has upheld a ban on sending state troops in Portland, Oregon, following a recent court ruling.

Appeals Court Concurs to Reconsider Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals decided on this week that it would reexamine the case concerning the president’s authority with an expanded panel of 11 judges. The judicial body also overturned a earlier ruling from a three-judge panel that had sided with the federal government.

Ongoing Dispute Over Military Presence

This legal directive represents the most recent turn in a protracted legal battle over whether the former president has the authority and justification to send national guard forces in the city. Approximately two hundred troops have been in uncertainty since the end of September when the deployment effort was initiated in response to months of protests.

Conflicting Arguments

The federal government has claimed that federal officials at the ICE facility in the southern part of the city were under attack, while city and state officials maintain that municipal police have control of the circumstances.

Contrary to characterizations of Portland as a conflict zone, residents have been posting footage of scenic paths and a thriving food scene, and planning events such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the increased military presence.

Recent Legal Actions

The Tuesday ruling came after a US district judge in Portland issued two temporary restraining orders this month – one blocking the federalization of the Oregon national guard, and another stopping the deployment of any national guard troops in Oregon, after efforts to circumvent the initial injunction by calling up troops from California.

On the previous day, the ninth circuit panel had temporarily suspended the initial decision – permitting control of state troops – but the second ruling stayed effective, preventing the physical sending of the forces.

En Banc Review

The latest ruling means the matter will be heard “en banc” – with both rulings under consideration together – by a panel of 11 judges.

“This ruling shows that the truth matters and that the judicial system are striving to hold this administration accountable. The constitution limits the president’s power, and local populations cannot be treated as a training ground for expansive government power,” stated the legal representative in a statement.

“The court is sending a definite signal: the executive leader cannot send the armed forces into American urban areas unnecessarily. We will continue protecting state legislation, values, and autonomy as this legal proceeding progresses and our fight continues in the courts.”