🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold policy to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, campaigners, and families are monitoring closely to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

European Trend

Across Europe, a growing group of countries are exploring comparable measures.

• The Danish government has stated a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister arguing that phones and networks are "robbing our children's innocence". Legislation may be formalized next year.
• Norway is preparing to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media account holders. The media minister have suggested that an Australian-model ban could be "an measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked the legislature to enact a proposal increasing the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has recommended a comparable move, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The government in the Netherlands has recommended guardians to block their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a symbolic statement demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 unless parental consent is granted. While it cautions of the "addictive" design of these apps, the move does not create mandatory rules.

"An effective age restriction is a solid first step," stated one MEP supporting the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Eye

In the UK, the administration has kept open a future ban, emphasizing that "no measure is being dismissed" but maintaining any action must be "based on conclusive research".

Last year, support grew behind a bill to impose controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end weakened. Nonetheless, the government committed to further research the issue.

Charities have voiced concerns. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after encountering harmful online content argues that a simple age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could result in a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the failure of the tech sector to design tools that are secure and fit for minors," commented a prominent online safety campaigner.

The United States: A State-by-State Approach

Across America, action is largely happening at the state level against a backdrop of country-wide stalemate.

• Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure banning those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a rule restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media time per day, with any further use needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also enacted laws requiring parental consent for minors to create social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and suggestions from various individuals to copy the Australian example, a nationwide ban is currently seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Beyond the West, further states are also considering moves.

• The Malaysian government intends to prohibit social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for one major platform to 16.

But, international organizations strike a more cautious tone. The UN children's agency has advised that age-based restrictions carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The body highlights that the internet can be a "lifeline" for isolated young people and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to improve user protection.

Even as this international debate continues, the actions of this nation and others demonstrate that governments internationally are less and less content to wait for the industry to self-regulate.